Loom vs Clay

Full side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and use cases to help you pick the right tool.

Bottom line: Loom is both cheaper and competitive - a strong pick for most teams.

Loom

Screen and camera recording tool for async team communication

4.5 / 5From $12/mo
Clay

AI data enrichment and outreach automation for go-to-market teams

4.6 / 5From $149/mo

Pricing Comparison

PlanLoomClay
FreeYesYes
Starter$12/mo$149/mo
Pro$15/mo$349/mo
EnterpriseCustomCustom

Loom is cheaper at the Starter tier ($12/mo vs $149/mo).

Feature Matrix

FeatureLoomClay
Screen and camera recordingYes-
AI transcription and summaryYes-
Viewer engagement dataYes-
CTAs in videosYes-
Team spacesYes-
75+ data enrichment sources-Yes
Waterfall enrichment logic-Yes
AI message personalization-Yes
Outreach sequencing-Yes
CRM sync-Yes

When to Choose Each

Choose Loom if you need...

  • +Fastest way to create async updates
  • +AI transcription included
  • +Great team adoption
DevelopersAgenciesProject ManagersStartups

Choose Clay if you need...

  • +Best GTM enrichment tool
  • +Powerful waterfall logic
  • +Huge data source library
SalespeopleMarketersAgenciesStartups

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Loom or Clay?

Clay scores higher in our review (4.6/5 vs 4.5/5). However, Loom may be a better fit depending on your specific needs and budget.

Is Loom cheaper than Clay?

Yes, Loom is cheaper at the Starter tier ($12/mo).

What is the difference between Loom and Clay?

Loom focuses on screen and camera recording and ai transcription and summary, while Clay emphasizes 75+ data enrichment sources and waterfall enrichment logic. Loom is best for Developerss, Agenciess, Project Managerss, Startupss, while Clay suits Salespeoples, Marketerss, Agenciess, Startupss.

Explore more Video Tools tools