Clay vs Linear

Full side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and use cases to help you pick the right tool.

Bottom line: Linear is both cheaper and higher-rated - a strong pick for most teams.

Clay

AI data enrichment and outreach automation for go-to-market teams

4.6 / 5From $149/mo
Linear

Fast, opinionated issue tracker built for software teams

4.7 / 5From $8/mo

Pricing Comparison

PlanClayLinear
FreeYesYes
Starter$149/mo$8/mo
Pro$349/mo$14/mo
EnterpriseCustomCustom

Linear is cheaper at the Starter tier ($8/mo vs $149/mo).

Feature Matrix

FeatureClayLinear
75+ data enrichment sourcesYes-
Waterfall enrichment logicYes-
AI message personalizationYes-
Outreach sequencingYes-
CRM syncYes-
Git-integrated issue tracking-Yes
Cycle planning sprints-Yes
Roadmaps-Yes
AI-powered triaging-Yes
Keyboard-first design-Yes

When to Choose Each

Choose Clay if you need...

  • +Best GTM enrichment tool
  • +Powerful waterfall logic
  • +Huge data source library
SalespeopleMarketersAgenciesStartups

Choose Linear if you need...

  • +Incredibly fast and snappy UI
  • +Developer-focused workflow
  • +Beautiful design
DevelopersStartupsFounders

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Clay or Linear?

Linear scores higher in our review (4.7/5 vs 4.6/5). However, Clay may be a better fit depending on your specific needs and budget.

Is Clay cheaper than Linear?

Yes, Linear is cheaper at the Starter tier ($8/mo).

What is the difference between Clay and Linear?

Clay focuses on 75+ data enrichment sources and waterfall enrichment logic, while Linear emphasizes git-integrated issue tracking and cycle planning sprints. Clay is best for Salespeoples, Marketerss, Agenciess, Startupss, while Linear suits Developerss, Startupss, Founderss.

Explore more Automation tools