Clay vs Hotjar

Full side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and use cases to help you pick the right tool.

Bottom line: Hotjar is both cheaper and competitive - a strong pick for most teams.

Clay

AI data enrichment and outreach automation for go-to-market teams

4.6 / 5From $149/mo
Hotjar

Behavior analytics with heatmaps, recordings, and user surveys

4.3 / 5From $32/mo

Pricing Comparison

PlanClayHotjar
FreeYesYes
Starter$149/mo$32/mo
Pro$349/mo$80/mo
EnterpriseCustomCustom

Hotjar is cheaper at the Starter tier ($32/mo vs $149/mo).

Feature Matrix

FeatureClayHotjar
75+ data enrichment sourcesYes-
Waterfall enrichment logicYes-
AI message personalizationYes-
Outreach sequencingYes-
CRM syncYes-
Heatmaps-Yes
Session recordings-Yes
User surveys-Yes
Feedback widgets-Yes
Funnels-Yes

When to Choose Each

Choose Clay if you need...

  • +Best GTM enrichment tool
  • +Powerful waterfall logic
  • +Huge data source library
SalespeopleMarketersAgenciesStartups

Choose Hotjar if you need...

  • +Visual behavior insights
  • +Easy setup
  • +Good for UX research
MarketersDesignersDevelopersStartups

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Clay or Hotjar?

Clay scores higher in our review (4.6/5 vs 4.3/5). However, Hotjar may be a better fit depending on your specific needs and budget.

Is Clay cheaper than Hotjar?

Yes, Hotjar is cheaper at the Starter tier ($32/mo).

What is the difference between Clay and Hotjar?

Clay focuses on 75+ data enrichment sources and waterfall enrichment logic, while Hotjar emphasizes heatmaps and session recordings. Clay is best for Salespeoples, Marketerss, Agenciess, Startupss, while Hotjar suits Marketerss, Designerss, Developerss, Startupss.

Explore more Automation tools