Clay vs Bolt.new
Full side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and use cases to help you pick the right tool.
Bottom line: Bolt.new is both cheaper and competitive - a strong pick for most teams.
Pricing Comparison
| Plan | Clay | Bolt.new |
|---|---|---|
| Free | Yes | Yes |
| Starter | $149/mo | $20/mo |
| Pro | $349/mo | $50/mo |
| Enterprise | Custom | Custom |
Bolt.new is cheaper at the Starter tier ($20/mo vs $149/mo).
Feature Matrix
| Feature | Clay | Bolt.new |
|---|---|---|
| 75+ data enrichment sources | Yes | - |
| Waterfall enrichment logic | Yes | - |
| AI message personalization | Yes | - |
| Outreach sequencing | Yes | - |
| CRM sync | Yes | - |
| In-browser development environment | - | Yes |
| Full-stack generation | - | Yes |
| npm package support | - | Yes |
| Deploy to Netlify and Cloudflare | - | Yes |
| AI chat with file context | - | Yes |
When to Choose Each
Choose Clay if you need...
- +Best GTM enrichment tool
- +Powerful waterfall logic
- +Huge data source library
Choose Bolt.new if you need...
- +Runs entirely in browser
- +No local setup needed
- +Fast prototyping
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Clay or Bolt.new?
Clay scores higher in our review (4.6/5 vs 4.4/5). However, Bolt.new may be a better fit depending on your specific needs and budget.
Is Clay cheaper than Bolt.new?
Yes, Bolt.new is cheaper at the Starter tier ($20/mo).
What is the difference between Clay and Bolt.new?
Clay focuses on 75+ data enrichment sources and waterfall enrichment logic, while Bolt.new emphasizes in-browser development environment and full-stack generation. Clay is best for Salespeoples, Marketerss, Agenciess, Startupss, while Bolt.new suits Developerss, Founderss, Solopreneurss.