Loom vs Supabase

Full side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and use cases to help you pick the right tool.

Bottom line: Loom is both cheaper and competitive - a strong pick for most teams.

Loom

Screen and camera recording tool for async team communication

4.5 / 5From $12/mo
Supabase

Open-source Firebase alternative with Postgres, Auth, and Storage

4.7 / 5From $25/mo

Pricing Comparison

PlanLoomSupabase
FreeYesYes
Starter$12/mo$25/mo
Pro$15/mo-
EnterpriseCustomCustom

Loom is cheaper at the Starter tier ($12/mo vs $25/mo).

Feature Matrix

FeatureLoomSupabase
Screen and camera recordingYes-
AI transcription and summaryYes-
Viewer engagement dataYes-
CTAs in videosYes-
Team spacesYes-
Postgres database-Yes
Authentication-Yes
Storage-Yes
Edge Functions-Yes
Realtime subscriptions-Yes

When to Choose Each

Choose Loom if you need...

  • +Fastest way to create async updates
  • +AI transcription included
  • +Great team adoption
DevelopersAgenciesProject ManagersStartups

Choose Supabase if you need...

  • +Real Postgres under the hood
  • +Great DX
  • +Generous free tier
  • +Open source
DevelopersStartupsFounders

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Loom or Supabase?

Supabase scores higher in our review (4.7/5 vs 4.5/5). However, Loom may be a better fit depending on your specific needs and budget.

Is Loom cheaper than Supabase?

Yes, Loom is cheaper at the Starter tier ($12/mo).

What is the difference between Loom and Supabase?

Loom focuses on screen and camera recording and ai transcription and summary, while Supabase emphasizes postgres database and authentication. Loom is best for Developerss, Agenciess, Project Managerss, Startupss, while Supabase suits Developerss, Startupss, Founderss.

Explore more Video Tools tools