Loom vs Hotjar

Full side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and use cases to help you pick the right tool.

Bottom line: Loom is both cheaper and higher-rated - a strong pick for most teams.

Loom

Screen and camera recording tool for async team communication

4.5 / 5From $12/mo
Hotjar

Behavior analytics with heatmaps, recordings, and user surveys

4.3 / 5From $32/mo

Pricing Comparison

PlanLoomHotjar
FreeYesYes
Starter$12/mo$32/mo
Pro$15/mo$80/mo
EnterpriseCustomCustom

Loom is cheaper at the Starter tier ($12/mo vs $32/mo).

Feature Matrix

FeatureLoomHotjar
Screen and camera recordingYes-
AI transcription and summaryYes-
Viewer engagement dataYes-
CTAs in videosYes-
Team spacesYes-
Heatmaps-Yes
Session recordings-Yes
User surveys-Yes
Feedback widgets-Yes
Funnels-Yes

When to Choose Each

Choose Loom if you need...

  • +Fastest way to create async updates
  • +AI transcription included
  • +Great team adoption
DevelopersAgenciesProject ManagersStartups

Choose Hotjar if you need...

  • +Visual behavior insights
  • +Easy setup
  • +Good for UX research
MarketersDesignersDevelopersStartups

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Loom or Hotjar?

Loom scores higher in our review (4.5/5 vs 4.3/5). However, Hotjar may be a better fit depending on your specific needs and budget.

Is Loom cheaper than Hotjar?

Yes, Loom is cheaper at the Starter tier ($12/mo).

What is the difference between Loom and Hotjar?

Loom focuses on screen and camera recording and ai transcription and summary, while Hotjar emphasizes heatmaps and session recordings. Loom is best for Developerss, Agenciess, Project Managerss, Startupss, while Hotjar suits Marketerss, Designerss, Developerss, Startupss.

Explore more Video Tools tools