Loom vs Ghost

Full side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and use cases to help you pick the right tool.

Bottom line: Ghost is both cheaper and competitive - a strong pick for most teams.

Loom

Screen and camera recording tool for async team communication

4.5 / 5From $12/mo
Ghost

Open-source publishing platform for newsletters and membership sites

4.4 / 5From $9/mo

Pricing Comparison

PlanLoomGhost
FreeYesNo
Starter$12/mo$9/mo
Pro$15/mo$25/mo
EnterpriseCustomCustom

Ghost is cheaper at the Starter tier ($9/mo vs $12/mo).

Feature Matrix

FeatureLoomGhost
Screen and camera recordingYes-
AI transcription and summaryYes-
Viewer engagement dataYes-
CTAs in videosYes-
Team spacesYes-
Newsletter publishing-Yes
Membership and subscriptions-Yes
0% transaction fees-Yes
SEO-optimized-Yes
Self-hosting option-Yes

When to Choose Each

Choose Loom if you need...

  • +Fastest way to create async updates
  • +AI transcription included
  • +Great team adoption
DevelopersAgenciesProject ManagersStartups

Choose Ghost if you need...

  • +No revenue cut
  • +Clean writing experience
  • +Great SEO
  • +Self-host option
Content CreatorsSolopreneursFreelancers

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Loom or Ghost?

Loom scores higher in our review (4.5/5 vs 4.4/5). However, Ghost may be a better fit depending on your specific needs and budget.

Is Loom cheaper than Ghost?

Yes, Ghost is cheaper at the Starter tier ($9/mo).

What is the difference between Loom and Ghost?

Loom focuses on screen and camera recording and ai transcription and summary, while Ghost emphasizes newsletter publishing and membership and subscriptions. Loom is best for Developerss, Agenciess, Project Managerss, Startupss, while Ghost suits Content Creatorss, Solopreneurss, Freelancerss.

Explore more Video Tools tools